* * * *
One summer, before heading to Piha Beach to spend the day at a friend’s house, I felt an intuitive impulse that I should take a name card with my phone number on it. Not possessing one, and despite having no idea why I would need it, I cut a piece of veneer to business card size and wrote my ID details in ballpoint.
That day in Piha was when I first met Kirsty, my partner-to-be. She was part of a large party of Palm Society members who traipsed in to inspect my friend’s garden. She had an unmistakable effect on me, making the chattering crowd and the sound of the waves recede into the background. After the group had emptied their cups of tea they prepared to move on. Not so fast! Out came my card and, as the cliché goes, the rest is history. How did I know I was about to meet my future partner? An interesting question, but it hardly mattered to me. The important thing was that somehow I did know.
It makes sense that such psychic experiences occur in the context of close relationships, because these relationships form over long periods, building a strong binding power. The difference in this case was that a psychic bond occurred in a close relationship that was yet to be.
Another example of this type involved my father. His house had recently been burgled. A few days afterwards I needed to visit him, and as I drove into his street I had a flash that the burglar was back. Rationality immediately stepped in, dismissing the idea. As I drew up to the house, I noticed my father was out. I retrieved the key from its usual hiding place and opened the back door. I then heard a clatter at the far end of the house. It was the sound of the burglar as he made his escape through a window close to the road. I knew this because, when I went to check, the window was wide open. In my father’s study computer discs were strewn over the floor and various items missing. Intuition involves understanding immediately, without needing any proof from observation. In this case I had a strong connection with the family home.
The following example involves a special kind of dramatist, a “projector” of deep personal imagery. In 1991 I was in Tokyo where I saw a solo performance by Kazuo Ohno, nonagenarian and co-founder of butoh dance in post-war Japan. It was a short but highly focused performance, set to evocative ambient music. As the dance proceeded a tension developed, a feeling faraway and immediate, epic and sad—though words fall short of capturing the intensity of what I felt. I wondered if I was the only one caught in a rising well of emotion, and glanced down my row of the audience. Everyone was transfixed by the performer, holding their breath, some already in tears.
What was this collective emotion if not a subtle force field transmitted via the body and mind of the performer, in collaboration with the music, which held us all in one shared psychic space? It is in times of togetherness, when we share laughter or intense empathic contact, that we bridge the gap between self and other. So why couldn’t psychic connection also be stimulated by powerful aesthetic experiences?
My last example is exceptional in that it concerns human-animal interaction. Millicent, one of our four chickens, was ten years old and dying. We brought her inside, to a confined area in the garage, where we set up straw and water. The day came when it was clear she would last no longer than a few hours. We made regular checks on her condition. At some stage in the afternoon, about ten minutes after visiting her, I had a subtle, naturally-fragrant olfactory sensation, lasting no longer than one in-breath. I went straight to the garage. Millicent had died. Were my perceptions an illusion? Or merely a coincidence? Yet why shouldn’t there be such an indicator of her departure, after having spent a decade with her? She was far more than anonymous poultry. We had a special connection.
Telepathic connection is common in the animal world. Large schools of sardines or murmurations of starlings move in coordinated waves, the changes too fast for any individual fish or bird to be able to follow. The simplest, sensible explanation is that they are connected via a collective, psychic link. What the examples recounted here suggest to me is that psychic connections are far more common in both the human and animal worlds than we ordinarily think.
* * * *
I don’t claim any special capability. Rather, I consider our psychic faculties to be natural, but underrated and underdeveloped. Some readers might suspect an unreasonable credulity on my part in ascribing the above incidents to psychic and paranormal phenomena—although paranormal is misleading; a better label would be “normal but rare”. In fact, I consider scepticism valuable when reviewing or judging these types of experiences. Yet there is healthy scepticism and unhealthy scepticism. Healthy scepticism keeps us questioning and helps prevent self-delusion. Unhealthy scepticism takes the form of a blanket dismissal of any and all such cases, viewing them as irrational superstition, dishonesty, occult nonsense, or self-deception that discloses some psychological problem such as suggestibility or the need for security.
Unhealthy scepticism is the attitude that currently prevails in the secular West. Through the Western education system we are taught that the world works within the senses’ geography of truth. Whether we are conscious of it or not, the Western world is dominated by a materialist world view, the tenets of which are rarely spelled out. Materialism is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as a doctrine maintaining that nothing exists except matter and its movements and modifications. Matter being unconscious, the implication is that we live in an unconscious, purposeless universe, our sense of self is an illusion, and our mind is nothing more than activity of the brain, the result of neurones firing in concert.
The problem is that non-ordinary experiences, such as those that involve ESP, telepathy and intuition, are the imps nibbling at materialism’s fringes. Because they contradict materialism’s conclusions, a common reaction is to simply ignore the intruders, or deny their existence. Yet the question remains: psychic and paranormal experiences occur, so what are we to make of them? How can an event, such as the one my partner and I experienced in Burkina Faso, dovetail with our secular, “enlightened” viewpoint—the prevailing philosophy of a mechanical, completely desanctified world? It can’t. Consequently, sceptics dismiss psychic perceptions as mere anecdotes about vague coincidences or as supernatural mumbo-jumbo. This refusal persists despite a widening of perspective among researchers working in a number of scientific fields who question the nature and extent of human perception. The result is a growing rift in science.
On the one hand is the power of scientific and educational institutions, which teach and defend the materialist paradigm. Advocates of materialism demonise as pseudoscience any theories or practices unfaithful to its guiding assumptions. On the other are scientists who are applying the scientific method to investigate areas such as non-ordinary perceptions, while continuing to study the natural world through observation and to experiment and apply the scientific tradition of free enquiry.
In Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science, published in 2014, eminent scientists in the fields of psychology, neuroscience, medicine, biology and psychiatry have made a direct challenge to materialism, claiming it is now an outmoded ideology. They do so while acknowledging scientific accomplishments and grounding their investigations in empirical observations. Their concern is to make use of recent discoveries to broaden knowledge of fringe experiences and the contribution our own minds make to them. One item in their manifesto states: Mind (will/intention) can influence the state of the physical world and operate in a non-local (or extended) fashion, i.e., it is not confined to specific points in time, such as the present. Also, events may be meaningfully, rather than causally, connected.
This points in the direction this book travels. In the following pages I will use my experiences as springboards to explore a range of trans-conscious, non-local and extended perceptions. I suggest these are as essential to our experience as any “rational” forms. Furthermore, they point to a new paradigm of reality.
Consider this last example. At the start of our trip to West Africa, Kirsty and I had flown into Bamako in Mali. We were supposed to meet the tour guide of a local company but had no information about where to find him. Our Malian friend in New Zealand said we should just ask someone in the street, saying that Big John had sent us—a highly tentative arrangement, to say the least.
Bamako is a big city; at that time it had a million residents. As the sun rose on our first day there, the temperature climbed quickly. Streets filled up fast. Produce was being laid out. Women swathed in beautifully-coloured fabrics, and others in rags, were feeding their babies. Men were fixing mopeds, carrying loads, sawing wood or sitting around fires. Behind them all was a jumble of tin shacks, rubbish piled beside open sewers, and close, congested traffic edging its way through the throng of merchants, mothers, barrow-boys and infants. We desperately needed to sort out our onward travel, but by mid-morning had got nowhere, just becoming hot, bewildered and lost.
Our only recourse was to try the far-fetched method suggested to us. I approached a group of teenage boys and in incompetent French said that Big John had sent us. The one I spoke to seemed to instantly comprehend. A battered taxi was summoned, instructions given to the driver, and we were taken on a labyrinthine journey down roads, where no traffic rules applied, to a hotel where the shoe-shiners had a throne for their customers and two men could be seen lounging in the sun. They were Sori and Diallo, waiting to drive us to Mopti, Bandiagara and Burkina Faso.
How did that work? Could it have been pure serendipity that those boys knew Big John and where we needed to go? There may have been only one hotel in town organising tours for foreign travellers. Or perhaps fortune favoured the questing traveller?
But there was also something about this old and entirely different culture. It was a place where the limits of the possible are established, and breached, by the ideas, beliefs and traditions of the people. Deep down, these regions of West Africa have their own anima loci, their own regard for the spirits that animate their world, and their own long-accumulated, collectively-determined perception of reality. That difference—from the secular, rational Western world view—could somehow authorise what had happened to us in Gaoua: sacrosanct fetishes that were part of a long-established animist culture, that were assembled and consecrated to protect others, also had a means for protecting themselves.
No, declaim the rationalists among us. Yet Western culture has its own marginal zones of the extraordinary. They are grounded in the sentient glow we wake to every morning. What is this lantern in our skull? What is the wider context that enables marginal experiences to occur? And what are their implications for our picture of reality?